
007 First Light's Cocky Bond Is Hiding Something Dark
IO Interactive's younger Bond isn't just cocky for the sake of it. Beneath the smug grin is an orphan with rage issues, and the studio says that's exactly the point.
"This character's got some rage in him."
That line, from IO Interactive narrative and cinematic director Martin Emborg in a recent interview with Eurogamer, is probably the single most interesting thing anyone at the studio has said about 007 First Light's version of James Bond. Not the tailored suit, not the gadgets, not the License to Kill system. The rage.
Most of the conversation around Patrick Gibson's portrayal has fixated on the surface: he looks young, he looks smug, he doesn't look like the Bond some fans wanted. Push Square ran a poll and roughly 70% of respondents said they either love the new take or like it with reservations, while about 10% outright hate it. That split is predictable. Every new Bond casting triggers the same cycle. People hated Daniel Craig's blond hair right up until Casino Royale made them shut up about it.
But IO isn't just banking on time healing all wounds. The studio is deliberately building a character whose exterior doesn't match what's underneath, and that's a far more interesting creative bet than simply making Bond younger.
An Orphan With a Chip on His Shoulder
Emborg describes Gibson's Bond as having "an unearned confidence" that comes from being a young man who hasn't yet confronted his own mortality. "When you're a young man, you feel immortal," Emborg told Eurogamer, "and he'll definitely learn that he's not." Senior combat designer Tom Marcham goes further, painting a picture of someone shaped by a rough childhood: "He's an orphan, and there's an attitude that maybe he didn't have the greatest time growing up. Maybe he's been in some tough fights before, and he knows how to handle himself, and he's got some inner rage that comes out every now and then."
This is where 007 First Light starts to sound less like a safe origin story and more like something with actual teeth. IO is describing a Bond who isn't suave because he's naturally cool under pressure. He's performing composure over a foundation of anger. That tension, if the writing delivers on it, could produce a more layered protagonist than any Bond game has ever attempted. I'm curious whether the game earns that characterisation or just tells us about it in cutscenes while the gameplay stays surface-level.
The combat system seems designed to let some of that rage bleed through mechanically. Marcham explained to GamesRadar how the License to Kill system works in practice: "Bond won't shoot an unarmed man. If you have a section where absolutely no one has any guns, you won't shoot anyone, so you'll be using the close combat system." But the moment an enemy draws a weapon, everything escalates. "Once the gun's in their hand, they're showing clear intent to kill: License to Kill," Marcham says. "You dynamically escalate in those spaces, which means that we have this unique system where you can suddenly trigger a gunfight at almost any point in that encounter."
That dynamic escalation idea is the kind of design that could feel incredible or completely scripted depending on execution. If encounters shift based on when and how violence breaks out, IO might have something that plays unlike anything in the stealth-action space. If it's just a contextual trigger dressed up in fancy language, players will see through it in the first hour.
Gibson himself seems to understand the weight of the role. In a recent video discussing his casting, the Irish actor, best known for playing Dexter Morgan in the prequel series Dexter: Original Sin, said he was "pretty stunned" when he got the call. "It was a massive shock, and I mean, just like an honor to even be auditioning for it," Gibson said. "I think it was like one of the most exciting phone calls I've ever had."
Marcham, for his part, welcomes the debate around the casting. "If we made a Bond where no one had any opinions on them, it would be the dullest Bond ever made," he told Eurogamer. "So the fact that we've got a little controversy on that, I think it's a good thing." He's right about that. The worst possible outcome for a new Bond isn't backlash. It's indifference. And nobody is indifferent about this one.
I wrote earlier this week about IO's philosophy that a dull Bond is worse than a divisive one, and the more details that emerge about this version of the character, the more confident I am that the studio has a clear creative vision rather than a focus-tested compromise. Whether the game itself delivers on that vision is the only question left, and we won't have to wait long. 007 First Light launches on PS5, PC, and Xbox Series X/S on May 27th, with a Switch 2 version planned for later this summer.
Stay on top of every update — find all the latest patch notes and gaming news at XP Gained. Join our Discord for live patch note alerts and discussion.
Written by
Nathan LeesGaming journalist and founder of XP Gained. Covering patch notes, breaking news, and updates across 160+ games.
Related Posts

A Dull Bond Is Worse Than a Divisive One, Says IO
IO Interactive's devs argue that a Bond nobody has strong feelings about would be a creative failure, and they're leaning into the backlash around Patrick Gibson's portrayal.

Too Smug? 007 First Light's Bond Is Built to Be Humbled
IO Interactive's developers say the lopsided smirk and cocky attitude that's divided fans is a deliberate narrative choice. This Bond is meant to get knocked down.

A Real Wearable Tech Brand Just Became a Bond Gadget
Even Realities is putting its real-world G2 smart glasses into 007 First Light as a usable Bond gadget, marking a strange new frontier for product placement in games.